Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proshockers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''speedy deleted by Anthony.bradbury with edit summary NN group. '''. W.marsh 14:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Proshockers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources, notability is stated but not defined, etc. Joe Decker 04:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC) I should add that it was a disputed prod. --Joe Decker 05:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertions of notability (almost asserts non-notability actually), only sources are generally-cited and are self-published. Delete as failing WP:CORP. DMacks 05:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete appears to be an attack page on the company by a disgruntled ex-employee —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  16:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Non-notable company, so tagged. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 19:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.