Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosper De Mulder Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP.  Spinning Spark  13:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Prosper De Mulder Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a notable company. Much of this page is a significant attack on the company, but the group does not appear to have the notability necessary to sustain an article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject of an MMC report, Parliamentary questions and apparently had a key role in the spread of vCJD, all backed with good sources. The balance of the article could be better, but there's enough for notability. Dalliance (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you have some links for those? Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * They're in the article. Ref. 6 (Competition Commission website) for MMC report, ref. 16 (Former PM's website) for PMQs and ref. 11 (displays link for Sunday Times article - this should be changed to the Internet Archive version) for vCJD. Dalliance (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Arguably ref 11 is more about exports and not PDM, no? Thargor Orlando (talk) 14:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Definite keep -- The MMC report and involvement in BSE are quite enough to amke the company notable. As I read the article, its business is in processing slaughter house waste into useable products.  As such it is engaged in producing ingredients for the food industry.  Such middlemen tend not to operate in the face of the public; indeed they may purposely keep a low profile, but that does not prevent them being notable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * How does an MMC report confer notability? Thargor Orlando (talk) 17:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.