Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosponsive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will recreate a disambiguation page at Piritu Eddie891 Talk Work 11:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Prosponsive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

COI template removed and the PROD was contested but the article still fails to meet the notability guidelines. KartikeyaS (talk) 08:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion for a non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NEOLOGISM as an adjective and WP:CORPDEPTH as a brand name. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:NEOLOGOISM. Article doesn't demonstrate broad use, and overly emphasises that its trademarked. Imaginestigers (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NEOLOGISM, history also reveals evidence of possible socking (and COI) Changed to revert to previous revision, page was previously a disambig page and should be reverted to that. — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 16:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Revert to disambiguation page per Berrely. Paisarepa (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Unless I'm misreading the edit history, there appears to have been some unorthodox editing going on here: this edit to the page Piritu changed it from a disambiguation page to one with the content currently at Prosponsive, then the following edit moved the page from Piritu to Prosponsive; they then turned Piritu into a redirect. The SPA who did all this hasn't been active since and it's not easy to tell whether this was in good faith, but it all seems quite confusing.
 * I propose that the page be deleted (I've already voted further up the page) and that we leave Piritu as a redirect, since most of the wikilinks on the disambiguation page were red. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Further comment. Given the Sockpuppet investigation into the page's main editors, one of whom shares a name with C.L. Services Inc, which describes itself as "a Prosponsive© logistics company", I feel it would be prudent to salt the page. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 21:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm new to Wikipedia. I am just trying to keep my company page live and appease my boss. Please let this page stay live, I have removed Neologism references and any marketing/sales related information. Please believe me, I am just trying to do my job and keep this page live. I have never been an editor on Wikipedia before so that's why everything looks strange to you all, I just have no idea what I am doing. Just trying to get by and keep my boss happy. Please... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timgriffin27 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * @Timgriffin27 if you have a professional or personal connection with the subject of this Wikipedia article, you are not permitted to edit it and must declare your connection. Please see the relevant Wikipedia policy for further details. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete for reasons put forth by Dom Kaos. Also agree that this should be salted, and a disambiguation page created/restored for 'Piritu' (which, AFAICT, has nothing to do with 'Prosponsive'). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.