Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protect-A-Bed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) '''-- Cheers, Riley   Huntley ''' 00:24, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Protect-A-Bed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Citations are all based on primary sources or advertorials. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - The topic passes WP:GNG. Note that these sources found are NOT primary or advertorials; they're from reliable newspaper and magazine sources:, , , , , , , , . Northamerica1000(talk) 01:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I am unconvinced about those links above. They appear to be mostly verbatim press releases, which Third-party_sources warns against using as sources.   is actual journalism, at least.  That and the Daily Record make it a week keep from me, although it needs some serious cleanup/  Morwen - Talk 18:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually Furniture Today is a newspaper, and the articles are written by its staff writers. Home Textiles is a magazine, although after consideration, some (but not all) of the articles appear to possibly be sourced from press releases, although they're written by staff writers. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Northamerica1000. Automatic  Strikeout  01:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I accept NA's argument; the sources are sufficient.  DGG ( talk ) 18:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.