Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protectedpdf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Protectedpdf
Contested prod. Author attempted to flesh it out a bit but it's still just an ad. "Protectedpdf" gets a grand total of 286 Google hits. Opabinia regalis 05:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - The info about the software fails WP:SOFTWARE, and the rest is just about Document protection in general. --Daniel Olsen 06:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (although an article on document protection in general wouldn't go amiss). Not sure the Vitrium Systems article meets WP:CORP either - it certainly hasn't got any references. Yomangani talk 10:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - too much unsourced POV for my liking. BlueValour 19:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.