Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protecting the Rights of America's Youth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Protecting the Rights of America's Youth
Non-notable organization. Only hit in Google is the organization's Myspace page. John Nagle 18:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

PRAY does not have many hits YET, but it will – very soon. PRAY has been very active on a local basis, in Springfield, Missouri, where it was formed. It is sure to be an important group, on a national basis, as the 2008 elections get into full swing a week from today. User:macs417 13:10, 31 October 2005 (CST)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If the organization gains the notability status macs417 assures us it well, then the page can be easily recreated.  Until then, it does not meet the signifigance criteria for a corporation because of a lack of media coverage.  - b o b b y  19:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable organization, per Robertbcole. A  ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 19:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As Robertbcole notes, when this organization becomes notable, then it will warrant an article. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 20:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This group is currently non-notable, but the future is not set in stone, so it can be re-created if notability becomes established later on. --SunStar Net 20:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for now, but if/when this group meets WP:N, by all means re-list. Wildthing61476 20:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom without prejudice. Danny Lilithborne 20:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The group is as important as its liberal and conservative counterparts, currently listed in Wiki with no greater signifgance. --User:macs417 15:20, 31 October 2006 (CST)
 * Comment - I don't know what you mean by its "counterparts". By your own comment further up the page, it is clear that you don't believe PRAY is currently very notable.  As multiple users have stated, if and when the organization meets the community's guidelines the article can be recreated.  Until then, it has no place here. You can always userfy it in order to easily reinstate it when notability is achieved. - b o b b y  21:33, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep As macs417 has stated, the group is of growing signifgance. --User:Senatorsmith 15:53, 31 October 2006 (CST)
 * Comment - It is good practice to identify (if applicable) your relationship with any article for deletion that you comment on. I see from your userpage that you actually founded PRAY, which might slightly bias your views on this subject.  That fact aside, nobody is arguing with your assertion that PRAY is of growing significance.  The fact remains that it isn't currently notable per agreed upon Wikipedia standards. - b o <em style="color:blue;font-variant:small-caps">b <em style="color:red;font-variant:small-caps">b <em style="color:blue;font-variant:small-caps">y  22:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous comments. Cbrown1023 00:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice -- many dream of touching the stars, but only a few ever become astronauts. Haikupoet 07:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * PRAY does not have many hits YET, but it will – very soon. It'll have to get them without Wikipedia's help. Delete. --Calton | Talk 07:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not yet notable, if ever. I would like to see a five year rule for organizations.  If they were not started at least five years ago then they get no article.  Short-lived organizations that are notable but that then die, could come in after death.  There is just too much promotion going on in the Wikipedia. Bejnar 20:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - (2006 - 5 = 2001) PRAY was founded in 2000. You didn't read the article... you know, the one you're saying needs to be deleted... --User:Senatorsmith
 * Comment My reasoning remains the same, not notable.  Sorry I missed that unverified date.  The myspace reference indicated that PRAY is a 16 years old from Springfield, MISSOURI, is married with Zodiac Sign:	Leo. The Myspace article appears to have been created in August 2006. There is no notability there. Bejnar 16:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Would you quit replacing my signature with the unsigned notation! It's really annoying. --User:Senatorsmith --User:Senatorsmith --User:Senatorsmith
 * Comment What is annoying is your editing of other people's comments, which you have been doing. Wildthing61476 21:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.