Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protection & Advocacy, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Protection &amp; Advocacy, Inc.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ORG; no evidence of non-trivial coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources. Largely a rehash of primary sources affiliated with the subject, combined with WP:COATRACK problems. Deleted as an expired prod (see page log), but then re-created by the now-banned User:Ombudsman with the edit summary "restore unscrupulously vandalized article" (!) MastCell Talk 04:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletions.  —Gavin Collins 08:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as MastCell says, no non-trivial independent sources are cited, and a quick look around the Googleshere doesn't find any which would make the case for notability. Guy (Help!) 16:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete per nom and Guy. —Angr 15:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim  17:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.