Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protection of rights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 12:16, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Protection of rights
My main reason is to nominate an invalid speedy candidate. I however vote weak delete in the sense I have really no idea in what context this article is about, whether it is redundant or not, and not sure if it's complete nonsense and will readily change my vote if someone else can justify this article's existence. Natalinasmpf 05:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - A very short article with no context -- it's also just plain nonsense --Mysidia (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - no context. Dlyons493 12:31, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom Jwissick  (t)  (c)  16:40, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - article claims that protection of rights is restriction of rights of one group for the sake of another (I think). Google does not support that as the primary meaning of the term, which is used to mean pretty much what it sounds like in virtually every context. Chick Bowen 17:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologistic use of term, personal essay, original research. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:05, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.