Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protein episteme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Neuroepistemology.  MBisanz  talk 00:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Protein episteme

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rambling essay, full of WP:OR and WP:POV. Even if the subject is perhaps notable, this article is irredeemable. PROD was replaced by a merger notice to Neuroepistemology, but that article suffers from the same problems and currently is also at AfD. Randykitty (talk) 11:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, RK, about your concern in all these topics and by this page. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   We are following your suggestions changing OR, POV and improving redaction.  --Karol Alexandre (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge. Now that there is a short stub at Neuroepistemology, the phrase "protein episteme" can be added there, but there is no justification for a separate page on the subject. The pro- and con- arguments have already been given at Articles for deletion/Neuroepistemology, and perhaps the AfDs should be combined. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge – Unsurprisingly, as I was the one who originally proposed it, I am in favor of merging this article with the very similar and related Neuroepistemology. There is even more possible now that Neuroepistemology has been stubified. Bensci54 (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.