Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protein music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The issues identified by the nominator have been addressed by editing, and there is a consensus that this is both a valid concept and one that meets the notability guidelines. If it is still wished to pursue a merge then that should be the subject of a separate discussion. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Protein music

 * – ( View AfD View log )

May be a hoax. Sources provided are primary and unreliable Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 17:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to experimental music. I'm quite sure it's not a hoax.  It would be nice to have some references from an author besides Ohno but at least those citations appear to be from peer-reviewed journals, as is appropriate for supporting articles on the sciences.  It might just make for a pretty decent article later.  As it is now, it would probably find a better home in an article such as experimental music. Several Times (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Here is another paper on the subject. It references a number of other potential sources, such as this one. Several Times (talk) 19:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ adding Reliable journal articles from multiple authors. — Saeed (Talk) 22:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Looks like a valid stub with enough references to support its notability. It requires copy-editing, some editing/simplifying to extend the range of its audience and some cleanup for style compliance. However, I am sure that deletion is off the table. This article is definitely not a hoax. Fleet Command (talk) 00:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - odd, but not a hoax. I think it's shaping up as a decent start, with reliable sources. I re-worded the lead to make more sense. Bearian (talk) 21:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, its "oddness" can be reduced. I do not think it is odd at all but that is probably because of my computer background. I still remember modem and their horrible Modem music. But since DNA's structure is harmonic, the resulting sound is also musical. Fleet Command (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.