Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protein ontology

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep --Allen3 talk July 3, 2005 21:36 (UTC)

Protein ontology
Self-promotion; notability debatable. Presumably the topic deserves an article, but it might be better to start afresh. -- Avocado 00:29, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
 * Delete, would be speedyable as a platform for a link. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 00:40, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to keep article has been rewritten. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd June 30, 2005 13:18 (UTC)
 * Uhh.... Ok, well, get rid of it, and get an actual encyclopedic article for it. So, clean-up really... I think. Satanicbowlerhat 01:18, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It the opic is real article will be created. Pavel Vozenilek 01:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if rewritten. The topic is encyclopedic but the current article is just advertising. JamesBurns 04:11, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete The project is ambitious, far from completion and I'm not entirely sure it's encyclopaedic under this title PdDemeter 05:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Me thinks this falls under the ol' crystal ball category. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 06:06, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Oh joy, turning Wikipedia into an advertisement. Though this may be keepable if he wrote... What protein ontology even is! otherwise Delete like the wind Redwolf24 06:16, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as written. -- BD2412 talk 12:53, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
 * Vote changed to keep only Harmil's stub. -- BD2412 talk June 28, 2005 20:33 (UTC)
 * Keep see my edits, below the rule in the page in question. If we decide it's acceptable, just blank the original bits above the rule. -Harmil 01:24, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Harmil's version. No need to delete if we've got something sensible to put there -- it is a potentially valid topic for an encyclopedia article.  -- Avocado 04:06, 2005 Jun 27 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. Josh Parris &#9993; 29 June 2005 06:16 (UTC)


 * Keep as re-written and expand, obviously. Bubamara 29 June 2005 21:32 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.