Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protomap (proteomics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Benjamin Cravatt III. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Protomap (proteomics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems to be a rather advertisement-style article about a method that does not seem very relevant. The corresponding paper has 25 citations according to Google scholar hroest 21:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Benjamin Cravatt III, whose project this is. Doesn't seem notable enough for a stand-alone article (need actual articles about it, not just research that uses it). But the bio article about its creator does not require that every one of his works be WP:N, merely that they be documented. DMacks (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge & redirect per DMacks, cutting down to one paragraph. A bit of detail on approach would be useful and appropriate in Benjamin Cravatt III, but it doesn't seem to rate an article on its own.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. A link to author's web site explains the subject much better than this WP page. So, yes, probably just merge the content with links to other pages, possibly to proteomics. My very best wishes (talk) 02:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.