Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Provider magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G11 by Jimfbleak. (NAC)  Erpert  Who is this guy? 07:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Provider magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable, no reliable sources, only refs are self-published. Borderline promotional, has conflict of interest. No GNews hits. GHits that I found were passing or trivial mention. GregJackP  Boomer!   23:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete clearly it is non notable, no cites are used, a conflict of interest is present (In my opinion) and it does seem to be promotional. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.