Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Provocative Art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. StarM 02:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Provocative Art

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Claims to be an art "movement" but provides no evidence to that effect. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--this is really a bit ridiculous. What was this, a class assignment? This term is not a concept, and even if it were, no evidence whatsoever is provided. Drmies (talk) 02:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe the writer meant "transgressive art", which means art that shows your own willy or whatever, thereby cheaply gaining a certain notoriety among the easily impressed. Oh no, wait, there's a link to "Provocative Therapy" which redirects to somebody in the "Neurolinguistic Programming" mumbo-jumbo. Uck. So IDONTLIKEIT and ITHINKITSBOLLOCKS aren't valid reasons for deletion? Then delete it for lack of evidence. Tama1988 (talk) 11:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is original research, and the claim of a "Provocative Art Movement" is highly suspect.  I believe it's simply false.  I would want to see a source on who coined the term, and then at least 2 or 3 known artists belonging to this movement.  --Lockley (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.