Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proxy Networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 14:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Proxy Networks

 * – (View AfD) (View log · )

Promotion for non-notable company. Recreation of twice-speedied article by single-issue user. I have been unable to find significant third-party coverage of this company. The references given in the article are press releases or trivial mentions. Haakon (talk) 20:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: It appears to be a autopromo. -- MisterWiki  talk  ( SIGN / REVIEW )  20:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

My reply: The article is not an autopromo. I am trying to put up a page for this company. A similar company, LogMeIn has a page on Wikipedia, and they are of the exact same status. Many of their links are to their own webpage, as well. It is very unclear why this very reputable company is being denied an entry. There is no need or reason to just delete the page when I am trying very hard to satisfy the requirements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamalade515 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep -- My opinion: This article should stay. It seems that the vast majority of its competitors are on Wikipedia, among them Webex, GoToMeeting (which I use and endorse), DimDim (even better), etc. I've heard of this company and though the language could be improved, it's no worse than the other companies'. This article would be a work-in-process, as is the spirit of Wikipedia. -- Nedenchase (talk) 04:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC) — Nedenchase (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * This is not a valid keep reason. The question is whether the article passes the general notability guideline, and I cannot see that it does. Haakon (talk) 08:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fits the profile:  provides remote desktop software and remote collaboration software for helpdesk technicians, network administrators and IT managers. I couldn't find anything other than press releases announcing routine transactions.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.