Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proyecto Estrella


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Proyecto Estrella

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. Article contains 20 cites but 12 aren't about the organization and don't mention it at all, 6 mention it in passing only, and the remaining 2 cites (#4 and #5) though they do mention the organization up to 3 times, they are not articles about the organization per se (its history, directors, accomplishments, headquarters with actual physical address, etc.) but simply that the organization was involved in some advocacy activity. WP:OR is very clear, at WP:PSTS, that article notability is to be established by secondary sources and this article contains not a single secondary source. It also states articles may contain tertiary sources; this article contains none. Finally, all 20 sources in this article are all primary sources (newspapers) which are not sufficient in and of themselves to establish notability -- especially when only one of the (WAPA-TV) can be considered mainstream (required by WP:PSTS). In addition, the article's Talk Page has, for over 1-1/2 years, questioned its notability, but no actions were taken by the articles editors to attend to it in any manner that would had provided the secondary sources required. Finally, the article also had a warning tag on it, also for well over a year, questioning its notability but, again, no one has been able to prove its notability. For these reasons the article should be deleted. Mercy11 (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics,  and Puerto Rico. Shellwood (talk) 07:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'll be honest with you. I remember seeing this article years ago when I was going through all the talk pages of Puerto Rico articles and I thought 'this is not notable', but I didn't feel like going through all the sources. But now that you have mentioned it, I went through all the sources and it is exactly as you say. Most don't mention the organization at all, others mention it in passing, and #4 and #5 mention it but are not about the org. per se. Thanks. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.