Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prudential prime properties


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jujutacular  talk 03:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Prudential prime properties

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

For more than two years this article – complete with its lack of references, biased/advertising tone, and title issues – has sat on Wikipedia, created by an SPA. It doesn't seem to be too notable. (Also..."Maynard, Massachewcetts" [sic]? Really?) Raymie Humbert (t • c) 01:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: There seem to be other real estate companies with the same affiliation and name, for those looking for Ghits. The SPA, User:Aquinn04, is Allen Quinn, a listing agent with this particular company. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 01:58, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No, not really, in fact. You'll find that for all but two and bit months of those two and a third years, the article actually said "Maynard, MA". Uncle G (talk) 01:59, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - could not find significant coverage by reliable sources to establish notability.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 00:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Advertising. Carrite (talk) 03:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete but we should not attack people by calling them SPA. Otherwise, this could degenerate.  We could call admins "non-article writing busybodies" or AFD participants "troublemakers with too much time on their hands".  Let's put an end to this name calling. RIPGC (talk) 03:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Sock of banned editor. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and Note. Delete due to inappropriate promotional nature. Additionally, any attempt to disclose the identity of an editor is a violation of the privacy policy of Wikipedia/Wikimedia. Please see WP:PRIVACY for more information. The above attempt to disclose the identity of the originating editor of this article needs to be redacted. Cindamuse (talk) 05:19, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above posts. Absolute spam stuff. What's the point of this? Why is there a location listing? And what about notability? みんな空の下 (トーク) 05:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Pure advertispam. Also SALT as there's a good likelihood the SPA will return to reintroduce this article. Burpelson AFB (talk) 22:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - all too common realtors' office, not notable by any stretch, and there is no way to find reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 00:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.