Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prunus Girl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 19:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Prunus Girl

 * – ( View AfD View log )

not notable Night of the Big Wind (talk) 00:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep Comment The nomination shows no signs of having followed WP:BEFORE. One of a series of hasty nominations. Edison (talk) 01:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You warned me already for getting flak, nice that you give it yourself. In my opinion an article must show notability, not external sources. It is up to the original author to give evidence of notability, not for newpage-patrollers to check if an article is maybe notable. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 01:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. Pretty slim pickings in the CSE. --Gwern (contribs) 15:33 4 July 2011 (GMT)
 * Delete Search for coverage by reliable, third-party sources comes up empty, thus failing WP:BK and WP:NOTE. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Where did you look? Moscowconnection (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:ANIME's custom Google search quiry, which eliminates most scanlation websites and other known unreliable sources. I also checked ANN's encyclopedia entry to see if there were any international licenses, which could indicate potential coverage. However, there were no such licenses and the only coverage by ANN's news feed was relating to changes in the manga magazines. —Farix (t &#124; c) 16:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I asked because it seemed strange that you hadn't added any interwikis, while the Japanese one was number one in Google. The custom search seems okay. Moscowconnection (talk) 23:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per research by TheFarix.It would be helpful to know what possible sources were checked and found not to have coverage of the subject. Edison (talk) 01:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Added a reliable source. It's not much, but it's enough to prove the manga is mentioned in the news. Moscowconnection (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see any reliable third-party sources in the reference section. All I see is a link to the official website and a press release announcing a autograph session with the author, but there is no significant coverage of the manga itself. —Farix (t &#124; c) 16:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Still, it's a mention. :) Moscowconnection (talk) 23:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * But it still doesn't pass WP:NOTE, which requires significant coverage from an independent source instead of a one time mention in a press release/announcement. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.