Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prussian Blue (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep Nominator is an SPA with an WP:IDONTLIKEIT !vote. No reason for deletion given; WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Prussian Blue

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable, exists only to be a vandal target. No one has cared to look at or edit this article for the last couple years except occasional vandals/trolls. I can't see any good reason to keep it here. Souhletonya (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC) — Souhletonya (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Coffeepusher (talk) 19:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: There are many incoming links that seem to refer to the colour. Perhaps Prussian Blue should be a redirect to it, and the this American duo can either be deleted or moved to Prussian Blue (American duo) or something. J I P  &#124; Talk 09:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Distasteful and possibly defunct racist pop duo with significant coverage in mainstream sources, clearly notable. Can't delete on basis of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Jonathanwallace (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: very well known act, mostly due to their controversial views. A natural target for vandals, but that would be a silly rationale for deletion. Brain Rodeo (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jonathanwallace and Brain Rodeo. I note that it is inaccurate to say that no one "has cared to look at ... this article for the last couple years". Stats.grok.se indicates that this article gets over 1,000 views on a typical day. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Jonathanwallace. Distasteful but notable none the less. Jarkeld (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename the color is clearly the primary topic. 65.93.14.196 (talk) 07:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable but should be renamed since the far more notable pigment should be the primary topic. Jll (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. and move to Prussian Blue (band). Distasteful, but encyclopedic and referenced. Kudpung (talk) 13:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable band with coverage in multiple WP:RS. vandalism is cause to rename or protect, not delete.Coffeepusher (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.