Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prussian Holocaust (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Prussian Holocaust

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This unreferenced and POV article was nominated for deletion previously; the last significant content discussion was in May 2005. Google Books does not provide a single relevant source. Olessi 18:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the subject itself may merit attention (it's covered a bit at Vistula-Oder Offensive and expansion has been requested) but this "article" is little more than a dicdef and a dubious one at best when the article itself says that mainstream historians don't use the term. Carlossuarez46 21:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-admitted POV.DGG''' 02:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Baristarim 04:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced and likely unsourceable. Unsourced is not a reason for deletion but unsourceability is.  Even if it's not a neologism, it is unclear that the term is used often enough to be included in Wikipedia. --Richard 05:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: POV-term not used by any reputable historian. No encyclopedic relevance. Jesusfreund 09:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.