Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudo-acronym


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Acronym. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Pseudo-acronym

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:GNG, only source discussing the topic as such is a blog Polarpanda (talk) 21:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. It's covered in Acronym and is well known phenomenon per Google books (edit cant seem to fix link) . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Savonneux (talk • contribs) 22:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge anything to acronym that isn't already there. There's not enough to say about the topic for it to warrant its own article. +Angr 07:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to acronym. Articles are about summarising subjects, and it's a type of acronym.- Wolfkeeper  20:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.