Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudo-dating


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Rob e  rt  T 00:56, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Pseudo-dating
Delete Pure original research (if even that and not just some random slang definition) without much reference on the web. PhilipO 22:24, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Also has nonsense about "Schrödinger's cat" --PhilipO 22:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I took cat crap out now. Reconsider given recent edits? MPS 00:07, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete original rambling CDC   (talk)  22:45, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Try this search There was a sourcing question a couple months ago and I satisfied their objections. It's not original research because it compiles external primary sources rather than making wikipedia a primary source. I questioned the schroedinger thing this afternoon. I will take that out and I think the rest of it will stand on the sources provided. MPS 23:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * ~700 hits on Google makes this barely notable. I honestly think this is the kind of fluff that gives Wikipedia a bad name - Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. Pseudo-dating is simply a word that is self explanatory - like any word pseudo- . Cheers --PhilipO 00:21, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * If you believe that wikipedia is not a slang dictionary then I suggest you AfD Cisgender as well. MPS 22:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Dictionary material, if that.  No depth or greater relevance to make it encyclopedic. Durova 02:04, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; unencyclopedic neologism, not high-profile enough to merit inclusion here. Try urbandictionary, maybe. &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 04:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Rogerd 15:41, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.