Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudo-pantheism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 06:05, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Pseudo-pantheism
Utterly POV distinction: "my pantheism is real pantheism, yours isn't". Has been previously deleted, albeit not in this form. Redirect to pantheism to prevent recreation. -Sean Curtin 00:54, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * More to the point, the whole article is essentially meaningless. It attempts to draw a distinction, but doesn't actually bother to say what that distinction is. Delete. Haikupoet 01:50, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, un-encyclopaedic, POV fork. Megan1967 02:40, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite the wordiness, the meaning of this term is entirely clear to anybody who understands the prefix pseudo-.   And even if it wasn't, Wikipedia isn't a dictionary.   On top of all that, this seems like a pretext for some more POV along the lines of pan-atheism.    The place to discuss these points of view is the naturalistic pantheism article. --BM 04:49, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is essentially worthless, and attracts Vogel-spam. As suggested, redirect to pantheism to prevent POV re-creation. --Nat 08:00, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - should be a section in Pantheism. It's a real term used in Pantheism. What this article is actually about is things like Cosmotheism, which attempts to dress up White Separatism as "Pantheism." - David Gerard 13:25, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * The original article (written by me) mentioned "Cosmotheism" as a specific (and widely-recognized) form of psuedo-pantheism. The reference was removed by POV parties and replaced with attacks on naturalistic pantheism. --Nat 04:52, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The above comments say it all. Mel Etitis  ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 18:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 14:37, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect with Pantheism, for reasons stated by David Gerard; Psuedo-Pantheism is a real concept, and worthy of mention, but only makes sense when discussed in relation to what Pantheism is anyway. --BD2412 04:41, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.