Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Pseudome


While biology uses many words in -ome, this one does not seem widespread, to say the least: almost no google hit and (more relevant) no hits at all on Pubmed. The only page I have found on the web is on a Wiki and everyone knows that these things can not be trusted it links to a non-existing "project". Delete Schutz 22:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Whisp e ring 01:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Gnusmas 20:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nopnm., and --as a biologist--this seems like undocumented local lab slang at the most.DGG 05:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.