Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mannose Sensitive Hemagglutinin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mannose Sensitive Hemagglutinin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rejected prod but I have no idea whether or not this is a notable drug. No sources are provided. A google news search for Wantepuan shows nothing (in English at least), regular searches show only mirrors to this page. I suggested redirecting it but without a source there's nothing to merge. The image there was uploaded by the same user without even a link to a webpage or anything. It's a publicly traded company so this may be a hoax for all I can tell. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep but Move to "PA-MHSA": Googe search on PA-MHSA finds plenty of hits like this. Pam  D  00:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Even without the move, there are a lot of results for the full name, as opposed to the brand name. However, it's a medical journals, so I'm not sure if a bunch of journal articles suggesting the possibility of an effective treatment results in notability. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there a source that the Chinese FDA approved the drug? That's kind of its biggest claim at the moment, isn't it? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now: No secondary coverage. About 629 citations (h = 12) for academic articles on the drug; may be notable if Chinese sources are checked, but I'm not confident about this drug's notability because of the lack of secondary sourcing. Esquivalience t 00:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, at least based on English coverage. Hits on Pubmed and Google Scholar appear to be all primary articles from the same lab; reviews or coverage in news articles don't seem to exist. - HyperGaruda (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.