Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psi Intelligent Control


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Psi Intelligent Control

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a WP:FRINGE subject that fails WP:GNG. - MrX 20:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as gibberish, OR and failing notability standards. MjolnirPants   Tell me all about it.  21:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnotable. When I searched for it the one study was all I found. Perhaps this is just using some odd language and the phenomenon has a more normal name and already exists as an article so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt there. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 04:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've also had trouble finding significant coverage under this name.  It's possible that this is a thing, but it would need to demonstrate better notability before it came back. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough reliable sources mention this and reads like promotion. Also Farbod the author of the paper on the article is the creator of the Wikipedia article (using the same name). I think he is using Wikipedia to promote his papers, he has created other articles as well doing this. JuliaHunter (talk) 04:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.