Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psiram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Psiram

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think this passes WP:WEB. The sources listed are namechecks at best, nothing substantive that's actually about this website apart from a single blog post. Guy (Help!) 00:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Quite a few sources: . Carl Fredrik   💌 📧 13:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * But reliable? Namechecks don't substantiate notability, of course. Guy (Help!) 11:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Even the links to the parliamentary discussions given to demonstrate notability show only passing mentions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.