Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PsyTech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Biblio worm  17:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

PsyTech

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Deprodded without comment by original editor who also removed all maintenance tags and added a single unsourced statement. No evidence from ghits or google books search of the term being used other than as company name etc. Pam  D  07:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I see nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  01:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   18:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Couldn't see the term being used commonly. Until it is widely used, delete. — UY Scuti Talk  15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.