Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychea(Psyshit)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. joe deckertalk to me 18:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Psychea(Psyshit)

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete Does not meet criteria for WP:BAND -Aaron Booth (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Aaron Booth (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep, before nominating have you tried to take a look at the relative Russian version of the article, here, that is plenty of reliable references? Furthermore, a minimal search in Google News archives shows several hundreds of sources: . Keep, per WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Cavarrone (talk) 11:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. I am inclined to keep based on the coverage identified by Cavarrone, although I don't feel confident that I could tell which are reliable sources.--Michig (talk) 08:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Some of the sources used in the Russian article (Google Translate could be helpful): Известия (Newspaper), Московский комсомолец (daily and weekly newspaper), Звуки (award winning music site), Fuzz (magazine), Rolling Stone (magazine), Экспресс-Газета (newspaper), Телеканал (television channel), РБК (newspaper), Lenta.Ru (according WP among the most popular Russian news websites), Interfax (non-governmental news agency)... Cavarrone (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, good enough. Thanks. Keep.--Michig (talk) 09:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per GNG / WP:BAND and the reliable third-party sources identified by Cavarrone; running a random selection of cites through translate shows clear non-trivial coverage. Fosse8 (talk) 11:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Although, on reflection, I've made a huge assumption there - if all the sources are Russian-language sources, then does the group (who undoubtedly qualify as notable for an article on the Russian Wikipedia) still qualify as notable in the same way on the English Wikipedia? Not changing my vote, and I believe the answer should be "yes", but just thought I'd raise the question. Fosse8 (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes. If the group are notable in Russia (or any other country) they're notable. --Michig (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I had thought so, but it's good to be clear. Fosse8 (talk) 08:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as per references in Russian language wikipedia. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.