Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychology of beauty

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwiki to Wikisource, so I will keep the articles for the moment and submit them to the transwiki queue. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:54, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Psychology of beauty, The lagoon
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Also marked for copyvio, but copyright has expired: this is an essay by Ethel Dench Puffer Howes originally published in 1905. Project Gutenberg has a copy.  &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 6 July 2005 18:51 (UTC)
 * Delete; try Wikisource. Dcarrano July 6, 2005 20:09 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV, Project Gutenberg has a copy. Double Blue  (Talk) 6 July 2005 20:47 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wikisource. *sigh*  Not this guy again.  He puts PD texts here, and changes them to make it look like he's the author.  A previous example can be found at Votes_for_deletion/Ancient_Law.  He has another one that is marked copyvio right now (probably rightly so).  Wikibofh 6 July 2005 21:57 (UTC)
 * Oh, I added The lagoon to this VfD, if it wasn't already obvious. Wikibofh 6 July 2005 22:14 (UTC)


 * Wikisource - but with the proper attribution, of course. -- BD2412 talk July 7, 2005 01:08 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wikisource with proper attribution (and a check to see if the info is correct. Mgm|(talk) July 7, 2005 08:14 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and then RD to Ethel Dench Puffer Howes. BTW this is a nice essay. Klonimus 9 July 2005 06:20 (UTC)
 * Transwiki --> wikisource. --Klestrob44 05:51, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki but fix his changes (dates,attribution), or better yet get a fresh copy. Leave a short article about  the work and the transwiki'd reference.  Rich Farmbrough 12:59, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki, although I am unaware of just how notable a work must be in order to qualify for Wikisource, as I am unaware of how notable these particular works are. --Theaterfreak64 17:39, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikisource. Neutralitytalk 14:12, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikisource. Guarantee correct attribution, as others have requested.  To DoubleBlue, WikiSource strives to have every primary source that could be interesting to anybody.  There is no guarantee PG will be around in 50 years.  We have to be independent.  We should take advantage of PD material fully. Superm401 | Talk 02:01, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikisource. --BradBeattie 16:30, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.