Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychopablum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Psychopablum
I can find very few places where this word is even used. It may become a notable word...but until then, it is just some term people use, and got knows there are millions of those. Either we don't have any or we have all of them.  Voice of All T 23:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Voice of All T 23:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)
 * Delete - nothing more than a definition. --Bachrach44 15:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Please note that this is not a vote. The structure you have chosen has fallen out of use. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)
 * But it is easier to count :-). Voice of All T 23:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Regardless of whether it is easier to count or not, it is not the method wikipedia is currenly using. --Bachrach44 15:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.