Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychotronic Art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 15:19, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Psychotronic Art

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability of this article is dubious. Psychotronic art seems less a 'movement' than the practice of a single artist. A quick search of the internet was unable to find reliable sources independent of the subject, let alone significant coverage. Meticulo (talk) 13:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Yet another made-up Russian "art movement". Johnbod (talk) 14:00, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism associated with a single artist's work. The article uses a totally unrelated (1975) source in an effort to pad out claims about a term coined over twenty years later. There's nothing here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete it might be a thing, but people will have to write about it extensively in RS before it's an article.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - unable to find any independent reliable sources. Reddragon7 (talk) 04:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above as not sourceable, not notable, not a keeper. --Lockley (talk) 04:49, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.