Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pterafolk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 01:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Pterafolk

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable Dungeons & Dragons monster. No evidence of third party coverage. Has appeared in a couple of supplements relating to a single setting. J Milburn (talk) 13:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - minor monster at best. Maybe a brief mention on the Faerun page. Web Warlock (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - non notable. shadzar|Talk|contribs 18:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Web Warlock and others above. Non-notable. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per failing WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.