Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pteronophillia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, userfied. --Core desat 02:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Pteronophillia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, and will most likely stay so, according to the article itself. The very model of a minor general 14:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete although I love the closing lines: "All of this work has been done based off of nonfactual evidence". Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a piece of gibberish OR which leaves me with the uncomfortable feeling that this is someone's attempt to legitimise their sexual fantasies about chickens, although surely this warrants a move to BJAODN. My personal favourite line is "the ever popular fairy is indeed an ever popular target". I think I've met the guy he's talking about. -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  17:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-identified original research, probable neologism, and possible hoax. But move to BJAODN, definitely. EALacey 18:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quoting from the article itself: "Closing- All of this work has been done based off of nonfactual evidence, as no actual scientific evidence or novels of any sort exist documenting ,at the moment, such a fetish. All of the notation has been done by a pteronophilliac with the aid of a physchology major and a masters thesis on fetishes".  Fetish articles, in WP and online, are rife with protologistic constructions from arbitrary Greek or Latinate roots.  This is no exception.  Serpent&#39;s Choice 03:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * neutral because i think it has to be significantly reworked. I've userified it in case I ever have the time. The term itself is totally non-standard, but the general idea is a very old mythical concept, for example Leda and the Swan DGG 04:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.