Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pubephilia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  16:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Pubephilia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No significant coverage in multiple relaible sources. Google scholar shows no ghit. Fails to establish notability.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 05:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Made-up term, no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. While the term might possibly be in use somewhere, wikipedia is no good for dictionary definitions, and I do not see what could be written about this topic due to the abject lack of non-trivial discussion of it outside wikipedia.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 06:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No refernces to give it notability.Advocate (talk) 06:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per this made up name. Artene50 (talk) 08:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef. JuJube (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: fails WP:DICTIONARY, WP:V and WP:RS. Cliff smith  talk  16:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.