Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public-Key Cryptography (conference)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to International Association for Cryptologic Research. czar 15:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Public-Key Cryptography (conference)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is just an event calendar and should not be here and should just be redirected to International Association for Cryptologic Research and I have done so, but an editor insists that it goes through AfD. I'd be open to delete or redirect. Graywalls (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 04:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 04:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to International Association for Cryptologic Research &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 09:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. Nothing notable about this conference to merit its own stand alone article. Blue Riband► 15:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to International Association for Cryptologic Research Dwaro (talk) 12:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , so you seem to be in agreement with no objection. Is there a reason you're insisting on reverting redirects and insisting on going through AfD? Graywalls (talk) 21:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I strongly prefer merging over deletion/redirects, when the article can't be kept on its own. It seems that we disagree about that, so AfD should be used. Dwaro (talk) 22:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Then merge over the contents from page history if you feel what's already on the redirect target is insufficient. The purpose of redirect is so that after the relevant contents are merged, there's no duplicate contentsGraywalls (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, I will start merging then. Dwaro (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Comment Note to any admin reading this: the article had been merged already Dwaro (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to the target above is the right call here; I could not find sufficient sourcing to reach GNG, but basic facts about the conference series are verifiable. I don't see any policy-based reason for deletion. -- 20:49, 27 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.