Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Health Genomics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''keep. Well done, Lyrl.''' DS 17:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Public Health Genomics
Originally prod'ded by myself, de-prod'ed by author. I'm really not sure what this is supposed to be, but it read (and still reads) like the introduction to a seminar on the topic, and never really addresses what the title of the article is supposed to mean. While it has references, all the article does is ask a lot of questions. This is not an encyclopedia article. As it is now, I think it should be Deleted. Danny Lilithborne 01:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't figure out what this is actually about. As the nom pointed out, it reads like the synopsis of a seminar with the proposed reference/reading materials.  SkierRMH 03:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. We're not a place to lay out the agenda for a seminar, either. --Dennisthe2 04:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote changed to Keep. Good show, Lyrl, this works. --Dennisthe2 18:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag for cleanup. The topic certainly appears notable enough, with sponsorship from major universities, the CDC, and the European Union  as well as association with big-name groups like the Bellagio Conference (I'm familiar with them because they are responsible for LAM becoming a respected method of birth control).  A bad article is not grounds for deletion. Lyrl  Talk C 04:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I've taken out the seminar stuff and put in a stubby description. Lyrl Talk C 05:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This isn't that obscure of a field and it is growing with interest. This article will get populated and improved.Leah 10:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Lyrl. --Falcorian (talk) 21:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.