Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Law 113-167


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This is certainly going to be kept in some way, but note that User:Seraphim System has been blocked as a WP:SOCK. Anyone may create a merger discussion on the talk page if desired. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  11:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Public Law 113-167

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is another short and trivial act of Congress, akin to the one deleted under this discussion, and created by the same editor. I've rolled it up into the article on the act it amended, Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act of 1968, with the simple sentence "In 2014, the Act was amended to additionally apply to condominiums," which is all that's needed. All the procedural history, when it was submitted, which house passed it when, etc., is pretty much unnotable trivia. I don't see any reason to maintain the old page as a redirect.

For the convenience of those who want to look directly at the GPO info, see (statute);  (bill). TJRC (talk) 23:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep It is not "insignificant".  "A significant amendment to the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA)1 becomes effective on March 26, 2015."   "As we previously reported, a significant amendment to the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA) becomes effective on March 26, 2015.".  As noted by the ABA "In a rare showing of bipartisan cooperation..." .  Also, and plenty more.  --David Tornheim (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:David Tornheim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seraphim System (talk • contribs) 05:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:50, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act of 1968 (whose title could probably be shortened). This legislation is significant, but is best understood in the context of the parent law it was amending. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good disposition. TJRC (talk) 23:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC) Keep agree with user User:David Tornheim. --eLLey 02:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elton-Rodrigues (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.