Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public commercial assets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Star  Mississippi  03:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Public commercial assets

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Essay, previous deleted as uncited, now back with tangential citations, none of which verify the phrase claimed as the title. The one assertion that defines the phrase (WP:DICDEF?) is uncited. So same old stuff, just a few random citations added. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously deleted via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Business. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - per rationale provided by nominator. I failed to find suitable coverage of the term in a BEFORE-style search. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Last relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Surprisingly, keep. I don't know why other people aren't finding stuff, because GBooks and GScholar give me decent references. It appears to be a pretty new term but when it's used by the IMF and World Bank, it would appear to be sticking, and there seems to be something of substance to be said about it. Mangoe (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.