Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publish and be damned

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:15, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Publish and be damned
Advert. Online print-on-demand company with an Alexa ranking of 973,226. SWAdair | Talk 06:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity press advert. Average Earthman 06:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, perfectly obvious vanity advert. Why are we voting? --07:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)(signing my vote --Wetman 16:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete Obvious advertisement attempt. --Mysidia 07:48, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 10:43, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or rewrite. &mdash; Instantnood 11:05, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Funny company name though. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:49, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advert. -- BD2412 talk 15:22, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity piece on vanity press. jglc | t | c 17:22, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Freedom of the press or Delete.
 * D to the ezzle, l to the ezzeet, this article is an advertizzeet! MC Rocker 00:23, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .