Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puerta Real (Granada)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 08:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Puerta Real (Granada)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced since 2014 and does not seem to meet notability criteria per WP:NPLACE. I can't find non-trivial coverage in independent and reliable sources, only mentions of the name in the context of directions and addresses, but never descriptions in detail (not in English, at any rate). The article defines it as a neighbourhood, but it is not an official district I can identify: downtown Granada is called simply Centro (e.g. see Spanish Wiki articles Distrito Centro (Granada) or Distritos de Granada). Even the Spanish version of the article isn't promising: the only somewhat detailed sources are a tour agency website and a blog post, neither of which counts as reliable. This topic could be mentioned in another overview article or a future article about the Centro district, but unlikely to be helpful and verifiable on its own. R Prazeres (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Spain.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep This surprises me, while the Spanish sources are mostly blogspots the book in the bibliography on the well-developed Spanish language page has six pages devoted to Puerta Real, and there are many possible Spanish language sources.   along with hits from academic sources . SportingFlyer  T · C  06:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - sourcing as indicated by SportingFlyer seems adequate. Ingratis (talk) 04:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.