Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pugs and Kelly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - consensus appears that they are NN. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 15:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Pugs and Kelly

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable local midday radio talk show. Cap'n Walker 16:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. STORMTRACKER   94  19:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. Llajwa 15:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. Phasmatisnox 02:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Cap'n Walker going after more Dallas radio host articles.  It's so funny when you say "local."  You try and make it sound like this is Dallas, population 15,000.  There are 6.5 million potential listeners in the DFW metroplex; the fifth largest market in the United States.  I fail to see the notability issue.  Here's a Dallas Morning News article for you (link). ♫ Bitch and Complain Sooner ♫ 17:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. One article in a local newspaper from two years ago? "Potential listeners"?  Meh. Also Mr. Bitch and Complain, please comment on content and leave me out of your rants. Cap'n Walker 03:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Sorry, but you apparently have something against Dallas radio hosts as you continue to apply your brand of "If I haven't heard of it, it must not be notable," rationale.  Just because a specific subject can't be found wide-spread in Internet links certainly does not mean it's not notable.  As if the Internet is the end all be all of notability.  Expain how a radio show stays on the air for over six years in a top-five market?  Right, crappy ratings and no name recognition.  You got me. ♫ Bitch and Complain Sooner ♫ 04:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.