Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puja Agarwal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Apparently an autobiography (twice speedily deleted), previously declined at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Puja Agarwal. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 07:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Puja Agarwal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Furthermore, there is no reliable sources on the subject.

Note to closing admin: Page made by person with a possible conflict of interest and that a submission to article for creation for this article had been declined. Extremepro (talk) 11:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Extremepro (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Extremepro (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Extremepro (talk) 11:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 10.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 11:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:HEY is possible here and if so I'll change my vote. But googling for Puja Agarwal gets me facebook and linked in, and googling for Puja Agawarl Bolywood gets me Kajal Agarwal (both bolded so there may be a translation issue).  The account User:Puja Agarwal14 not just appears to share a name with the page under discussion, but has most of the contents of that page on her user talk page. Neonchameleon (talk) 13:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete fails general notability guideline. I did both searches User:Neonchameleon suggested struggled to find multiple reliable secondary sources. SarahStierch (talk) 01:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.