Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puk Kai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete, but please add some sources to the article. W.marsh 00:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Puk Kai
del This is English language wikipedia, not a guide in chinese profanities. `'mikkanarxi 22:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please refer to the discussion page of the said article for prior deletion discussion. No consensus was reached.--Cmlau 17:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete not-English expresion that has no prominence in English language. If it were borrowed into english use, such as gringo or schmuck, then it would be OK do talk about it. Mukadderat 18:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article has an entry on Cantonese WP. If you read the content of the existing English article, it shows that the term is a significant part of Hong Kong culture.  Furthermore, there are a number of articles on English WP about subjects named by Cantonese terms.  See Category:Cantonese terms.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 05:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I have no knowledge or interest in the subject. I'm neither going to vote for keeping it, or going around nominating for deletion articles in the subject. Wikipedia would be a more informative and productive project if all editors did likewise. Dekkappai 19:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article is a big part of Hong Kong Culture. Not only is it common to hear, but it is normally one of the first words of Cantonese someone learns it is so important. This article is not teaching Cantonese, it is discussing the culture around it. Culture is a valuable topic on wikipedia, and therefore it should be kept. See Category:Cantonese terms.HKChigger


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.