Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pukaar News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Pukaar News

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local news agency that does not appear to meet our notability requirements. There is some routine local coverage, as you would expect, but not significant coverage. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Granted, it's like some articles about journalists, it's hard to find sources about subject among the many by subject, but with significant coverage about Pukaar News in secondary sources found missing, it looks like they fail WP:GNG. Sam Sailor Talk! 23:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.