Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PulpWork Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:NOQUORUM. Minimal participation. Soft delete.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  10:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

PulpWork Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable publishing company. The article cites routine coverage and passing mentions, and a search for sources returns the same. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  14:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  The   Magnificentist  08:32, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.