Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulp Secret


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Pulp Secret

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a video blog, not reliably sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for web content. The notability claim here is that it exists, which is not automatically enough in and of itself, and it is single-sourced to just one footnote from a not-ideal source (Tubefilter), which isn't enough coverage to singlehandedly get a topic over WP:GNG all by itself. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have a lot more than just one hit of coverage. Bearcat (talk) 16:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 16:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete fails WEBCRIT, little to no third party coverage.-KH-1 (talk) 06:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and nomination. -ecotalk to me 19:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.