Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulsa diNura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Pulsa diNura

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Written as personal research, no additional verification given since Oct 2008, references dead links or misrepresented Eframgoldberg (talk) 12:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The sources in the article are adequate and appropriate to demonstrate notability. The lack of sources added after some arbitrary date is hardly an excuse for deletion and the sources available in the article and in the books listed here all further demonstrate independent notability of the subject. Alansohn (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - If the article contains WP:OR, remove it or tag it as such but this doesn't look to be exclusively OR such that it would require WP:TNT and the subject does appear to pass WP:GNG. See for example Times of Israel, Huffington Post, Daily Beast, Haaretz, Israel National News, YNet, Modern Judaism (academic journal)... &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 20:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Part and parcel of Jewish tradition, with a few modern cases to make it saucier. Debresser (talk) 17:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.