Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulverised fuel firing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. &mdash; Maggot Syn 13:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Pulverised fuel firing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced mini stub on non notable topic Myheartinchile (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep An easily verifiable practice. As a stub, this should be improved, and probably should be, rather than delete. -- Ratarsed (talk) 12:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominator is kidding ? Keep as a fundamentally encyclopedic topic. Suggest reading through the google books hits - Peripitus (Talk) 12:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep strong establishment of notability if you ask me. Coal mining is a huge relm of study.  I have no doubt lots of secondary reliable sources exist; finding them just requires (shudder) real research. -Verdatum (talk) 16:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: 5 minutes of work and I can confidently remove the and  templates. The article is now sourced and its notability well established.  Plasticup   T / C  16:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as an encyclopedic stub with room to expand. Vickser (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.