Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pune Kalakar Cricket League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Dlohcierekim (talk) per WP:CSD Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Pune Kalakar Cricket League

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable cricket league that fails WP:GNG. – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Article is WP:TRIVIA. Jack &#124; talk page 04:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-professional sports league, nothing notable about it at all. Ajf773 (talk) 06:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 11:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:ORG, the relevant notability guideline in this case - there is not "significant coverage in secondary sources" which are "reliable" and "independent of the subject" that I can see. In fact, there's very little coverage of any kind that I can find which suggests, in this day and age, that there's very little coverage of any kind. In terms of WP:CLUB, it is clearly not national or international in scope and, when the lack of sourcing is considered, seems to not even be particularly regional in scope or have an historical claim to be notable. For these reasons I would suggest deletion in this case. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ORG, and per WP:TRIVIA. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:Trivia. Johnlp (talk) 08:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is WP:TRIVIA.  Non-professional sports league and there is nothing notable about it.desmay (talk) 14:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails WP:GNG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  15:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.